ADAPT · Client Stories

Real organisations.
Real outcomes.

How A/NZ technology leaders use ADAPT to make better decisions, justify investment, develop their teams, and lead transformation with confidence.

9stories
7industries
A/NZall local
Filter by topic
All
🤖 Scale AI
📊 Communicate Value
⚡ Modernise
01
RSPCA Australia
Not-for-Profit
Scale AICommunicate Value
02
TAL Life Insurance
Insurance / FSI
Communicate Value
03
National Law Firm
Legal / Professional Services
Scale AICommunicate Value
04
Fire & Rescue NSW
Government
Modernise
05
Mission Australia
NFP / Social Services
Communicate Value
06
Gold Coast Health
Healthcare
Scale AIModernise
07
Fletcher Building
Construction / Industrials
Communicate ValueModernise
08
Air Services Australia
Government / Aviation
Scale AICommunicate ValueModernise
09
Nestlé Australia
FMCG / Consumer Goods
Scale AIModernise

Select a story to get started

Choose a client story from the left panel. Use the topic filter to find stories relevant to your prospect’s specific challenge.

01 Not-for-Profit RSPCA Australia
A lean NFP replaced Gartner with a local, multi-seat model — and found a practical path to AI through peer intelligence
🤖 Scale AI Across Enterprise 📊 Lead Stakeholder Alignment & Communicate Value
IndustryNot-for-Profit / Animal Welfare
Key personaHead of IT & Finance (now CFO)
Decision byCOO
Previous vendorGartner — 2 licences (~$120–130K/yr)
ADAPT services
Executive AdvisoryAI GovernancePeer IntroductionsEvents
The challengeAI ambition, lean team, and a Gartner contract that wasn’t delivering

RSPCA’s Head of IT & Finance was running a lean technology team with limited AI capability. The organisation was competing for donor dollars during a cost-of-living crisis, and leadership wanted to understand how AI could modernise operations and strengthen their market position — but no one in the team had done this before.

They had two Gartner licences costing approximately $120–130K per year. The analysts were capable, but too academic for an Australian NFP context. When Gartner offered to reduce to one seat at around $60–70K, RSPCA took the opportunity to evaluate whether something better existed.

Why ADAPTLocal practitioners and a model that enables the whole team

The Head of IT attended ADAPT’s CIO Network Effect event and signed up within days. Two things made the difference:

  • ADAPT advisors had real practitioner experience in the Australian market — they understood the dynamics of the role, not just the theory
  • The multi-seat model meant the entire team could benefit, not just the most senior person

RSPCA’s investment was slightly higher than Gartner’s reduced offer. The reason they proceeded: “You’re local and you can enable multiple members of my team — I like your model.” ADAPT also helped build the internal business case for the COO who signed off.

What ADAPT didAI foundations first, then the peer connection that accelerated everything
  1. AI governance foundations — delivered the policy and governance groundwork needed before any AI deployment. Right sequencing: capability before commitment
  2. Peer introduction to Brett Wilson — connected RSPCA’s CIO with the former CIO of Australian Red Cross, who had delivered several AI initiatives. Brett was invited to present directly to the RSPCA team and executive, sharing what Red Cross had learned and what RSPCA could replicate
The outcomeChosen over Gartner — governance live, team enabled, peer intelligence unlocked
🤖
AI governance foundations live
Policies in place before deployment — the right starting point for an organisation new to AI
🤝
Peer connection to Red Cross CIO
Brett Wilson presented AI learnings directly to the RSPCA exec — immediate, practical intelligence
👥
Whole team enabled
Multiple team members benefiting — not just the most senior person
Won against Gartner on value, not price
COO approved despite slightly higher investment — local relevance and team enablement made the difference
🔒 Internal use only — not for external distribution. For the full prospect conversation guide, see the ADAPT Sales Story Cards.
02InsuranceTAL Life Insurance
A/NZ benchmarks gave a CIO the local evidence to justify cloud transformation to the board — and started developing his whole leadership team
📊 Lead Stakeholder Alignment & Communicate Value
IndustryLife Insurance / Financial Services
Key personaCIO (life business)
Context100% cloud migration, Microsoft deal underway
Previous vendorGartner — 1 licence
ADAPT services
A/NZ BenchmarkingCommunity InsightsExecutive AdvisoryTeam Development (3 GM seats)
The challengeStrong instinct, no local data to back it up when the board asked hard questions

TAL’s CIO was midway through a major cloud transformation — 100% to the cloud, including a significant Microsoft deal. He had a strong sense of where the organisation stood, but it was all instinct. When the board asked “How do we compare to our peers? How do you know this was the right decision?” he had no local data to point to.

He described it clearly: “I’ve got a good idea of where we sit — but it’s all in my head, kind of sentiment. I don’t have any data to back it up, and no local data anyway.”

Global Gartner benchmarks didn’t reflect Australian market conditions, and using them in board conversations was unconvincing.

Why ADAPTLocal data that actually works in board conversations, plus a team development model
  • A/NZ-specific benchmarks — data built from 480 Australian and New Zealand organisations, continuously updated, that reflected how local enterprises were actually structured and invested
  • Team development potential — the CIO came from a consultancy background and wanted to extend that external perspective to his GMs, not hold it only for himself

The turning point was attending ADAPT events and seeing benchmark data presented live. His instinct: “Where do we sit compared to what’s on that screen right now?”

What ADAPT didBenchmarks for board confidence, seats for team development
  1. A/NZ benchmarking across cloud, data maturity and modernisation — peer comparisons the CIO could use directly in board and exec presentations, replacing global averages with local evidence
  2. Three GM seats as a development pathway — emerging leaders brought into the membership as a structured investment, with a pathway to expand further
  3. ADAPT analyst keynote to 200 staff (planned) — Gabby Fredkin to present live AI insights across the business, creating a shared baseline organisation-wide
The outcomeCloud strategy board-approved, team development underway
📊
Cloud transformation justified with local evidence
A/NZ benchmark data used directly in board presentations — conversations shifted from opinion to evidence
Board approval secured
Cloud strategy approved with peer-validated local data behind it
👥
7 GMs on development pathway
Three seats allocated to emerging leaders, with a clear pathway to expand
🔒 Internal use only — not for external distribution. For the full prospect conversation guide, see the ADAPT Sales Story Cards.
03LegalNational Law Firm (name withheld)
Repeat benchmarking made 12 months of IT transformation visible to the business — and lifted team morale alongside the business case
🤖 Scale AI Across Enterprise📊 Lead Stakeholder Alignment & Communicate Value
IndustryLegal / Professional Services
Key personaHead of Technology (Australian operations)
New stakeholderChief AI Officer (recently hired)
ContextPost-merger; internal AI risk concerns
ADAPT services
Repeat BenchmarkingMark PesceClaudine Ogilvie
The challengeReal progress — invisible to the business, just as scrutiny was about to increase

The Head of Technology at a national law firm had led 12 months of genuine transformation — improving data maturity, modernising infrastructure, building AI readiness. The work was real. But it was invisible to non-technical leaders.

Three challenges converged at once:

  • A newly hired Chief AI Officer was about to assess the IT function — with no quantitative evidence of what had been achieved, the team was exposed
  • The internal legal team was raising AI risk concerns about Copilot and GenAI, blocking progress without sufficient context to evaluate the risk properly
  • A major data retention decision — whether to hold data beyond the seven-year mandate for future AI training — had landed in IT without clear ownership or a risk framework
Why ADAPTRepeatable benchmarking that creates a track record, plus the right advisors for each problem
  • ADAPT’s benchmarking could be re-run at any point to show change over time — unlike a one-off consulting engagement
  • Gaps identified could be matched directly to the right advisor, turning assessment into action
  • The advisor network included practitioners who had dealt with precisely these AI risk and data governance questions in Australian law firms before
What ADAPT didBenchmark, re-benchmark, then address the two critical AI risk questions
  1. Baseline benchmark — assessed across five areas (Budget, Modernisation, Data & AI, Infrastructure, Cyber) at the start of the transformation program
  2. Track-change benchmark 12 months later — re-ran the same assessment to show measurable progress, giving the Head of Technology quantitative evidence of what had been achieved
  3. Mark Pesce on AI tooling risk — worked through the internal legal team’s Copilot and GenAI concerns, giving the technology leader the language to turn a blocking conversation into a productive one
  4. Claudine Ogilvie on data retention — reframed the data storage question from an IT decision to a business risk decision, pointing to the Optus breach as real-world context. The technology team was relieved to understand this wasn’t their call to own alone
The outcomeInvisible work made visible — and a people outcome that went beyond the business case
“It wasn’t just justifying IT spend — it actually empowered the team to make them feel that the work they were doing is being seen and appreciated by the business.”
— Head of Technology, National Law Firm
🏆
IT team recognised by the Chief AI Officer
Progress quantified and presented — the team received formal public recognition for the first time
💡
Data retention decision correctly escalated
Reframed as a business risk decision — technology team relieved of a call that wasn’t theirs to own
🛡️
Legal team moved from blockers to partners
Mark Pesce’s advisory gave the technology leader the language for a productive AI risk conversation
📈
Team morale measurably improved
Proving the work existed — not just asserting it — created a genuine boost in how the team felt about their contribution
🔒 Internal use only — not for external distribution. For the full prospect conversation guide, see the ADAPT Sales Story Cards.
04GovernmentFire and Rescue NSW
A government IT leader built a genuinely modern technology strategy — matched with an advisor who understood constrained environments, not just theory
⚡ Modernise Operating Models to Increase Agility
IndustryGovernment / Emergency Services
Key personaActing Director, IT Operations & Communications
Budget contextConstrained — government budget cycle
ADAPT services
Executive AdvisoryDylan NaidooStrategy Build
The challengeAsked to build a modern strategy in a constrained environment — and not sure where to start

Fire and Rescue NSW’s Acting Director of IT was asked to build a technology strategy for the organisation. His brief to himself was clear: something genuinely modern and forward-thinking, not limited by legacy government assumptions.

Two things made this hard:

  • He wasn’t sure how to structure the approach or where to begin — he needed someone who had done this before in a similar context
  • The organisation operated under constant budget pressure, so the strategy needed to be realistic about government funding constraints, not aspirational
Why ADAPTThe right advisor for the actual problem

The key was advisor match. A senior strategist from a big consulting firm would have been the wrong fit: theoretically capable, but without lived experience of building and executing in regulated, resource-constrained environments.

ADAPT matched him with Dylan Naidoo — an advisor whose background was specifically in regulated sectors where doing more with less is a daily reality, not a constraint to work around theoretically.

What ADAPT didStructure first, then build — a two-stage advisory journey
  1. Foundation session with Dylan Naidoo — focused on the most important question first: “Where do I start? How do I think about this?” Gave the IT leader a practical framework grounded in government IT realities, not aspirational frameworks designed for organisations with different constraints
  2. Follow-up session planned — once NSW budget processes cleared, a second session to continue building with the foundation established
The outcomeClarity and confidence — the hardest part of any strategy is knowing where to start
🗺️
Strategy structure established
Left the session with a clear framework and confidence to proceed — not just theory, but a practical starting point
⚙️
Right-fit advisor match
Dylan Naidoo’s constrained-environment background was the critical fit — a big-firm strategist would not have worked
🔒 Internal use only — not for external distribution. For the full prospect conversation guide, see the ADAPT Sales Story Cards.
05NFP / Social ServicesMission Australia
Custom A/NZ benchmarks overturned global analyst advice — and gave the CIO the evidence to win board approval for a two-year security program
📊 Lead Stakeholder Alignment & Communicate Value
IndustryNot-for-Profit / Social Services
Key personaCIO (Peter Smith)
Board pressureHigh — NIST risk score challenged
Also usingGartner (alongside ADAPT)
ADAPT services
Claudine OgilvieCustom BenchmarkingEventsCoaching (exploring)
The challengeA board demanding lower risk — while a global firm said they were already overspending

Mission Australia holds highly sensitive data, including the locations of women in domestic violence shelters. A security breach wouldn’t just be a data incident; it could put vulnerable people at direct risk. The board identified the organisation’s NIST risk score as too high and demanded a reduction in risk exposure.

The CIO had developed a two-year program to move from high risk to medium risk. But Gartner’s global benchmarks showed Mission Australia was already overspending on IT and security — creating a direct contradiction in the boardroom: why invest more when you’re apparently already spending too much?

He needed local data that reflected his actual peer group, not global averages built from organisations with entirely different risk profiles.

Why ADAPTCustom benchmarks against the actual peer group, plus board-level advisory expertise
  • Mission Australia operates at the intersection of NFP and healthcare. ADAPT could run benchmarks against both sector peer groups — Gartner’s global data couldn’t
  • Claudine Ogilvie is a former CIO and a current board member at multiple Australian organisations — she could coach the board communication approach with genuine board-level credibility

The CIO regularly brings questions to ADAPT that Gartner cannot answer: “I’ve asked Gartner if they can help me with this. They can’t. Can you help?”

What ADAPT didBoard coaching, strategy validation, and custom benchmarks that changed the conversation
  1. Advisory with Claudine Ogilvie (two sessions) — validated that Mission Australia’s NIST score was appropriate for an NFP of their risk profile, and coached the board communication approach from the perspective of someone who sits on boards herself
  2. Custom A/NZ benchmarking — ran benchmarks specifically against NFP and healthcare sector peers in Australia. The data showed investment was within normal range for their risk context — directly contradicting Gartner’s global comparison
The outcomeBoard approved the program. Gartner’s advice overturned with local evidence.
“Gartner told them they were overspending. Our local benchmarks — against their actual peer sectors — showed they weren’t. The board approved the program.”
— ADAPT Client Value Partner
Two-year cyber program approved
Full program signed off after local benchmarks reframed the investment conversation
📊
Gartner’s advice overturned with local data
Custom A/NZ benchmarks against real peer sectors gave the CIO the evidence to win the argument
🎯
Board narrative coached and delivered
Claudine’s dual role as CIO and board member gave the communication strategy unique credibility
🔒 Internal use only — not for external distribution. For the full prospect conversation guide, see the ADAPT Sales Story Cards.
06HealthcareGold Coast Health
Five seats, five completely different challenges — ADAPT’s largest client dropped Gartner entirely because “ADAPT listens, Gartner tells”
🤖 Scale AI Across Enterprise⚡ Modernise Operating Models to Increase Agility
IndustryPublic Health / Digital Hospital
Seats5 — all different roles and challenges
Senior sponsorExecutive Director: “Support my team”
StatusLargest client · Biggest upsell · Dropped Gartner
ADAPT services
Simon KrissAndy FosterMark PesceSheridan WareJohn Whittle
The challengeMultiple teams, multiple needs — no single solution that could address all of them

Gold Coast Health is one of Australia’s most advanced digital hospital organisations. The Executive Director’s brief to ADAPT was simple and revealing: “The best way you can support me is to support my team.”

Five senior leaders each had genuinely different challenges:

  • The data leader needed AI governance guidance for a highly advanced healthcare environment
  • The digital leader had lost her middle management and faced a significant team capability and communication gap
  • The Chief Medical Officer had built clinical AI tools but was hitting Australian data legislation issues he hadn’t anticipated
  • The Chief Digital Officer was bringing a custom data platform in-house and needed strategic and communication support to do it well
Why ADAPTThe only model that listens and adapts — rather than prescribing a standard approach

Gold Coast Health had been using Gartner. The Executive Director’s reason for switching was direct:

“I feel like you guys really listen to us. You’re not going, ‘Here’s what you need to do.’ It’s, ‘Okay, cool, let’s see how we can help you.’”
— Executive Director, Gold Coast Health

ADAPT’s approach — finding the closest relevant experience and adapting it to the specific context — was the only model capable of addressing five completely different problems simultaneously.

What ADAPT didFive advisors. Five value streams. All personalised.
  1. Simon Kriss with the data leader — AI governance guidance and market direction for an organisation already ahead of most of its healthcare peers
  2. Andy Foster with the digital leader — team coaching and communication uplift to bridge the capability gap left by the loss of middle management
  3. Mark Pesce with the Chief Medical Officer — identified that clinical AI tools were hosting Australian patient data with a US company in a way that conflicted with Australian privacy law — a governance risk caught before it became a serious problem
  4. Sheridan Ware and John Whittle with the CDO — strategic and practical advisory on the decision to bring a custom data platform in-house, examined from both a top-down and bottom-up perspective
The outcome“Every individual feels their department is being supported”
👥
Five stakeholders, five distinct value streams
Every seat holder receiving relevant, personalised support — each finding value in a completely different way
⚠️
Critical AI governance risk identified
Australian data legislation conflict in clinical AI tools caught before it became a legal or reputational problem
🏆
Largest ADAPT client and biggest upsell
Grew from initial engagement to five seats — Gartner dropped entirely
🔒 Internal use only — not for external distribution. For the full prospect conversation guide, see the ADAPT Sales Story Cards.
07IndustrialsFletcher Building
A construction company de-risked its decentralisation strategy before the board — finding critical problems with an industry-matched advisor before they became expensive ones
📊 Lead Stakeholder Alignment & Communicate Value⚡ Modernise Operating Models to Increase Agility
IndustryConstruction / Building Materials
Key personaCIO / Head of Technology
ApproverBoard (non-technical)
ContextMajor decentralisation underway
ADAPT services
Sheridan WareSimon KrissStrategy ValidationBoard Communication
The challengeStrategy ready for the board — but wanted an independent review before committing

Fletcher Building was rolling out a major decentralisation and needed a new technology strategy to support it. The CIO had developed the strategy and it was board-ready — but they wanted an independent review first. Two specific needs:

  • Find what could go wrong before the board committed — a strategy redirect mid-execution would cost far more than identifying gaps beforehand
  • Translate the AI governance component into language a non-technical board — one that builds things for a living — could actually engage with
Why ADAPTIndustry-matched advisor — not just a technology strategist

Sheridan Ware, former CIO of Charter Hall, was the match that made this engagement work. Her building and property sector context meant the review wasn’t generic IT advice — it was grounded in the realities of large Australian construction businesses. ADAPT’s ability to match the specific advisor to the specific context, rather than sending whoever was available, was the reason this worked.

What ADAPT didStrategy review, risk identification, and board communication planning
  1. Full strategy review by Sheridan Ware — identified specific risk areas including significant change resistance from long-tenured staff that would have derailed implementation if unaddressed
  2. Amendments made before board submission — the team addressed the identified risks; the version that went to the board was materially stronger. Board questions were about execution, not direction
  3. Simon Kriss on AI governance — framed the AI strategy component in business terms that directors with a construction background could engage with confidently
  4. Internal communication planning (follow-up session) — once the board approved, a follow-up focused on how to bring the organisation through the rollout
The outcomeProblems found before commitment — not during execution
🛡️
Strategy de-risked before board
Critical pitfalls identified and addressed — including change resistance that would have derailed implementation
⏱️
Time and credibility saved
Problems found before execution are always cheaper than problems found during it
🤖
AI strategy translated for a non-technical board
Simon Kriss helped frame AI governance for directors with a building industry background
🔒 Internal use only — not for external distribution. For the full prospect conversation guide, see the ADAPT Sales Story Cards.
08Government / AviationAir Services Australia
“ADAPT listens. Gartner tells.” — Australia’s most unique government authority found a partner that could handle unprecedented challenges across five stakeholders
🤖 Scale AI📊 Communicate Value⚡ Modernise Operating Models
IndustryFederal Government / Aviation
SeatsMultiple — all different roles
StatusLargest client · Biggest upsell · Dropped Gartner
ADAPT services
Sheridan WareDave HeacockSimon KrissAndy FosterDylan Naidoo
The challengeUnprecedented programs, critical infrastructure that can’t be switched off, and a team under real pressure

Air Services Australia manages Australian airspace — there is no other organisation that does what they do. At the time of engagement, they were managing several simultaneous high-stakes situations:

  • The One Sky Program — a nationally significant airspace modernisation, never attempted before
  • Western Sydney Airport readiness — a hard delivery deadline that couldn’t move
  • End-of-life critical infrastructure that couldn’t be decommissioned without shutting down the system it supports
  • An AI strategy being built from scratch in a novel operational environment
  • A specialist team in serious distress — people on stress leave, headcount requests ignored, and the Western Sydney timeline at risk

One stakeholder had also had a deeply negative prior experience with ADAPT and had refused to engage. The relationship needed to be rebuilt from scratch.

Why ADAPTThe only model that listens first — and finds the closest applicable experience even for problems no one has solved before
“I feel like you guys really listen to us. We do have unique problems, but you listen and you’re not going, ‘Here’s what you need to do.’ It’s, ‘Okay, let’s see how we can help you.’”
— Executive Director, Air Services Australia

ADAPT’s approach for unprecedented problems: find the closest relevant experience and adapt it to the context. The One Sky Program had never been attempted — but Sheridan Ware had managed a merger from 15,000 to 40,000 employees overnight. Different context, identical pressures.

What ADAPT didFive advisors for five stakeholders — each matched to their specific challenge
  1. Sheridan Ware with the One Sky project lead — managing an unprecedented large-scale transformation largely alone; Sheridan’s large-scale merger experience gave her genuine empathy for the pressures involved
  2. Dave Heacock with the Head of Service Delivery — strategy advisory for the stakeholder who had previously refused ADAPT engagement; rebuilt the relationship through persistence and two strong advisory sessions
  3. Simon Kriss with the AI strategy lead — building out Air Services’ AI capability in a genuinely novel regulatory and operational environment
  4. Andy Foster with the team leader in distress — reframed a people problem as a program delivery risk; the argument that Western Sydney Airport readiness was at risk without adequate capacity got leadership attention where direct people arguments had not
  5. Dylan Naidoo on operating model — advisory on managing end-of-life infrastructure that couldn’t be decommissioned, requiring creative thinking within severe operational constraints
The outcome“Every individual feels their department is being supported”
🏆
Largest client and biggest upsell
Gartner dropped entirely — ADAPT replaced it across the whole organisation
🔄
Hostile stakeholder relationship recovered
A stakeholder who refused engagement became an active advocate — through persistence and earned trust
⚠️
Program risk surfaced and escalated
Reframing headcount as a delivery risk got leadership attention that hadn’t been possible before
👥
Five departments individually supported
Five completely different value streams — each stakeholder finding genuine value in their own way
🔒 Internal use only — not for external distribution. For the full prospect conversation guide, see the ADAPT Sales Story Cards.
09FMCGNestlé Australia
Nestlé built 30 internal AI champions and launched a reverse mentoring program — solving a Copilot adoption problem that was never really about the technology
🤖 Scale AI Across Enterprise⚡ Modernise Operating Models to Increase Agility
IndustryFMCG / Consumer Goods
Key personaHead of IT / Digital Transformation Lead
ContextMicrosoft Copilot rollout; digital transformation
Participants30 digital influencers + senior leaders
ADAPT services
Sheridan Ware (Workshop)Gabby Fredkin (Keynote)Community Insights
The challengeCopilot licences bought, senior leaders not using them — and internal champions who lacked the credibility to change that

Nestlé’s technology team was rolling out Microsoft Copilot across the organisation. The problem had two distinct parts:

  • Senior business leaders weren’t engaging with the tools — blocking top-down adoption without realising it
  • The 30 internal digital champions selected to drive adoption lacked the personal brand and communication skills to actually influence the people around them

The reverse mentoring program — pairing junior digital-savvy staff with senior leaders — also needed a proper launch. Without a shared baseline of AI understanding, neither group would get the most from it.

Why ADAPTA unique combination of workshop delivery and live research capability — on-site
  • Sheridan Ware — moved from marketing into IT before becoming CIO at Charter Hall; had a specific skill in helping people position themselves as credible subject matter experts and translate technology into business value
  • Gabby Fredkin — ADAPT’s research analyst, able to present live, current A/NZ data as a keynote that would create a shared knowledge baseline for both groups simultaneously

The engagement required practical on-site delivery. ADAPT provided both components.

What ADAPT didBuild the champions, then launch the program with a shared baseline
  1. Phase 1 — Digital Influencer Workshop (Sheridan Ware) — After three prep calls with Nestlé’s IT leadership to align on objectives, Sheridan ran an interactive workshop with all 30 digital influencers. The focus was personal brand and communication, not technology: how to show up, how to talk to people above you, how to present information that lands. Within weeks, the influencers had visibly changed how they communicated and were implementing what they had learned
  2. Phase 2 — Reverse Mentoring Launch (Gabby Fredkin) — Gabby presented live ADAPT research on-site — covering AI adoption patterns, maturity levels, and where Nestlé sat in the landscape. The session included active workshopping on agentic AI use cases in small groups. Both groups left with a shared baseline of AI understanding, giving the reverse mentoring program a solid foundation from day one
The outcomeBehaviour changed, adoption launched, three ADAPT capabilities in one engagement
📣
30 influencers changed their behaviour
Communication style, confidence, and frequency all measurably improved within weeks of the workshop
🤖
Reverse mentoring launched on solid ground
Shared AI baseline meant both groups knew what they were doing and why — from day one
🔗
Advisory, research, and workshop combined
One engagement drew on three distinct ADAPT capabilities — demonstrating the breadth of what membership can deliver
🔒 Internal use only — not for external distribution. For the full prospect conversation guide, see the ADAPT Sales Story Cards.